Petitioner challenged a trial court order and sought a declaration that his attorney's statement was not binding on him. Counsel, on instructions, sought leave to withdraw the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~103
RAM AWATAR SHASTRI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Birendra Kr. Pandey, Advocate
versus
SHIPRA BANERJEE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shilpi Dey Auditya, Advocate for R-1 & R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 08.09.2025
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
SEPTEMBER 8, 2025
‘ rs’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2025 at 12:03:47
Ram Awatar Shastri
Shipra Banerjee
Anr.
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
