Petitioner failed to appear, deposit the amount directed by the earlier order, or take steps for notice to the respondent. The High Court concluded the petitioner was no longer interested and dismissed the petition and application in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: None.
versus
JITENDER YADAV .....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J NOVEMBER 7, 2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/11/2025 at 15:07:21
Pawan Kumar Sharma
Jitender Yadav
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
