Dismissed¶22

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Rahul Masih & Ors.

Delhi HC29 Jul 2025CM(M)/1379/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227; MACT Saket; Order I Rule 10 CPC; deletion of party/impleadment; motor accident claim; insurance company deletion application rejected; FIR by driver; chargesheet filed; investigation complete; protest petition; Ertiga car; Reliance General Insurance; Rahul Masih; petitions dismissed as withdrawn; Tara Vitasta Ganju; CM(M) 1379/2025, 1381/2025, 1382/2025, 1383/2025

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to the Petitioner to withdraw the Petitions; Petitions dismissed as withdrawn; all pending applications closed. No relief granted on merits. ¶22

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Rahul… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~46 to 49

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1379/2025 & CM Appls. 45415-16/2025 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

¶3

.....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Adv. versus RAHUL MASIH & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

¶5

(47) + CM(M) 1381/2025 & CM Appls. 45438-39/2025 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

¶6

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Adv. versus RAHUL MASIH & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

¶7

(48) + CM(M) 1382/2025 & CM Appls. 45443-44/2025 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

¶8

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Adv. versus RAHUL MASIH & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

¶9

(49) + CM(M) 1383/2025 & CM Appls. 45450-51/2025 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

¶10

.....Petitioner

¶11

Through: Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Adv. versus

¶12

RAHUL MASIH & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

¶13

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

% 29.07.2025

¶16

The present Petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2025 at 12:36:40

¶18

Constitution of India impugning the order dated 27.02.2025 passed by the learned MACT, Saket Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the learned Tribunal has dismissed the Application under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] filed by the Petitioner who was Respondent No. 3/Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. for deletion of its name from the array of parties.

¶19

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner makes two submissions. Firstly, he submits that since the FIR was registered by the driver of the vehicle which was insured by the Petitioner [the Ertiga car] and that the chargesheet has already been filed in the matters, the investigation is complete and thus, the Petitioner should be deleted from the array of parties. Secondly, he submits that the Respondents/Claimants should have filed their own separate FIR/protest Petition if they wanted any relief.

¶20

The Learned Trial Court examined the Application and has found that the negligence of the driver of the Ertiga car will require evidence to be lead and thus the deletion of the Insurance Company cannot be allowed at this stage.

¶21

After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks is granted permission of the Court to withdraw the present Petitions.

¶22

The Petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. All pending Applications also stand closed.

¶23

The parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

¶24

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶25

JULY 29, 2025/r

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2025 at 12:36:40

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Rahul Masih & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Rahul Masih & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Roshan Lal Vs Shanti Kiran (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Mahender Singh Dhakad Vs Shruti Rathore

Bhavya Electricals Vs R.K. Electrical Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Sanjeev Duggal Vs Kapil Kumar Sehgal

Ashish Tyagi Vs Mysore Light and Interiors Pvt. Ltd.

Mohd Azim Vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

Mukesh Kumar Bhardwaj Vs Gauri Shankar & Anr.

M/S Mysore Light and Interiors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ashish Tyagi

Sonu Vs Shiv Dass & Ors. (Liberty Vidocon General Insurance Co. )

Sanam Gulati Thorugh Spa Vs v K Gupta

Bhavna Gulati through Spa Vs v K Gupta

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Rahul Masih & Ors.

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Himmat Singh & Anr.

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Rahul Masih & Ors.