This order dismisses a petition seeking supervisory interference in a suit for possession where the defendant was struck off plea for non-appearance. The Court held that as final arguments are pending in the Trial Court, no interference is appropriate.
Petition disposed with liberty to challenge future orders if an appeal becomes necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
VIJAYANT KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocate.
versus
SMT SNEH GAKHAR
.....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 10.07.2025
CM APPL.40181/2025
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM(M) 1194/2025 & CM APPL.40180/2025
CM(M) 1194/2025
1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2025 at 12:51:00
proceeded ex-parte on 03.04.2025.
MANOJ JAIN, J
JULY 10, 2025 ‘dc’/shs
CM(M) 1194/2025
2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2025 at 12:51:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can exercise supervisory jurisdiction to interfere with an order striking off the plea of the defendant for default in appearance.
Vijayant Kumar Singh
Smt Sneh Gakhar
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
