Vinod Kumar and Anr. v. Neeraj Mittal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 151 CPC; inherent power of Court; correction/amendment of site plan; site plan filed 'upside down'; wrong locality description (Adarsh Nagar vs Adarsh Nagar Extension); dismissal of application for non-supply of copy to defendant no. 3 despite directions; order held not on merits; impugned order set aside to that extent; Trial Court directed to decide application on merits after hearing both sides; copy to be supplied within five days; liberty to seek preponement; next Trial Court date 02.09.2025; CM(M) 1175/2025; CM APPL. 39528-39530/2025; High Court of Delhi; Justice Manoj Jain; decision dated 08.07.2025; Vinod Kumar v. Neeraj Mittal.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of: impugned order set aside to the aforesaid extent; Trial Court directed to decide the Section 151 CPC application on merits in accordance with law after hearing both sides; plaintiffs directed to supply copy of the application to defendant no. 3's counsel within five days, with liberty to seek preponement of the 02.09.2025 hearing. Exemption applications (CM APPL. 39529-39530/2025) allowed subject to all just exceptions; pending applications also disposed of in the aforesaid terms.