Tax department sought to withdraw its appeal against a GST decision, with liberty to file a fresh appeal. The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with liberty in accordance with law.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh appeal in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX GURUGRAM .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC with Mr. Ritwik Saha and Mr. Akhil Sharma, Advs.
versus
M/S BHARTI INFRATEL LTD .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Yogendra Aldak and Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
% 11.08.2025
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
AUGUST 11, 2025 cd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/08/2025 at 11:44:31
Commissioner Central Goods and Services Tax Gurugram
M/S Bharti Infratel Ltd
V. Kameswar Rao
Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
