Allowed

Sameer v. the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC20 Jan 2025BAIL APPLN./96/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi disposed of five bail applications filed by Sameer, Gaurav, Mohit, Taufik, and Sameer S/o Mohd. Nashir. Considering the totality of circumstances, the court granted regular bail to all applicants subject to personal bonds, sureties, and specific undertakings.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on terms of personal bond of Rs. 25,000/-, sureties, mobile number submission, and non-criminal activity undertakings.

Sameer Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~5, 6, 7, 13, 14

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

BAIL APPLN. 86/2025, CRL.M.A. 574/2025

¶4

SAMEER

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asad Iqbal, Mr. Ali Mohd. And Mr. Sahanawaz, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

¶8

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Ld. APP for the State with SI Parmendra Kumar, ASI Subhash Chand and ASI Mohan Lal P.S. DBG Road. 6 + BAIL APPLN. 102/2025, CRL.M.A. 669/2025 GAURAV

¶9

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asad Iqbal, Mr. Ali Mohd. And Mr. Sahanawaz, Advocates.

¶10

versus

¶11

THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

¶12

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Ld. APP for the State with SI Parmendra Kumar, ASI Subhash Chand and ASI Mohan Lal P.S. DBG Road.

¶13

7 + BAIL APPLN. 107/2025, CRL.M.A. 689/2025 MOHIT

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:56:06

¶16

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asad Iqbal, Mr. Ali Mohd. And Mr. Sahanawaz, Advocates.

¶17

versus

¶18

THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

¶19

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Ld. APP for the State with SI Parmendra Kumar, ASI Subhash Chand and ASI Mohan Lal P.S. DBG Road. 13 + BAIL APPLN. 93/2025, CRL.M.A. 603/2025 TAUFIK

¶20

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asad Iqbal, Mr. Ali Mohd. And Mr. Sahanawaz, Advocates.

¶21

versus

¶22

THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

¶23

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Ld. APP for the State with SI Parmendra Kumar, ASI Subhash Chand and ASI Mohan Lal P.S. DBG Road. 14 + BAIL APPLN. 96/2025, CRL.M.A. 622/2025 SAMEER

¶24

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asad Iqbal, Mr. Ali Mohd. And Mr. Sahanawaz, Advocates.

¶25

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:56:06

¶26

versus

¶27

THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

¶28

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Ld. APP for the State with SI Parmendra Kumar, ASI Subhash Chand and ASI Mohan Lal P.S. DBG Road.

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶30

O R D E R

¶31

% 20.01.2025

¶32

The above Bail applications have been filed in FIR No.499/2024 under Section 110/115(2)/3(5) BNSS Police Station D.B.G. Road by the Petitioners/Applicants Sameer S/o Taufiq, Gaurav S/o Harish, Mohit S/o Harish, Taufiq S/o Buddhan and Sameer S/o Mohd. Nashir, seeking Regular Bail.

¶33

It is submitted that the injured and the accused are all neighbours and a fight had taken place between them resulting in registration of cross FIR No.499/2024 in which the Applicants are the accused and the FIR No.500/2024 against the Complainants in the present case. It is submitted that the accused Sameer S/o Taufiq, Gaurav and Mohit are in Judicial Custody since 02.11.2024 and accused Taufiq and Sameer S/o Mohd. Nashir are in Judicial custody since 04.11.2024. It is further submitted that the Charge Sheet already stands filed and the accused may be admitted to bail.

¶34

The Status Report has been filed on behalf of the State , wherein it is submitted that during the course of the investigations, scissors and chapad were recovered at the instance of accused Mohit and Sameer, though the

¶35

¶36

stick could not be recovered from accused Taufiq. CCL “R” was apprehended, but the hammer could not be recovered from him. The MLC of the victim Jatin, Suraj Bhan, Nitin and Ashrafi Lal state that the nature of injuries are Simple.

¶37

The Bail of the accused persons is opposed on the ground that the crime is heinous. If Bail is granted, there is a likelihood of them committing the same offence again, since they are neighbours. Accused Sameer has previous involvement in FIR No.181/2020 under Section 307/323/34 IPC P.S. DBG Road.

¶38

5. Submissions heard and record perused .

¶39

As per the case of the Prosecution, a fight had taken place between the accused and the injured parties and the cross FIRs were registered. A chargesheet has already been filed.

¶40

Considering the totality of circumstances, the accused persons namely Sameer S/o Taufiq, Gaurav S/o Harish, Mohit S/o Harish, Taufiq S/o Buddhan and Sameer S/o Mohd. Nashir are granted Regular Bail, on the following terms and conditions:

¶41

a) The petitioners/accused shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- and one surety each of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. b) The petitioners/accused shall appear before the Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing;

¶42

c) The petitioners/accused shall provide their mobile number/changed mobile number to the IO concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times;

¶43

d) The petitioners/accused shall not indulge in any criminal

¶44

This is a digitally signed order.

¶45

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:56:06

¶46

activity and shall not communicate or intimidate the witnesses. e) In case the petitioners/accused changes their residential address, the same shall be intimated to learned Trial Court and to the concerned I.O.

¶47

The copy of this Order be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent as well as to the learned Trial Court.

¶48

The above Bail Applications are accordingly disposed of.

¶49

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶50

JANUARY 20, 2025/va

¶51

This is a digitally signed order.

¶52

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:56:06

Sameer v. the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sameer v. the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Priti Yadav Vs Naman Communications

Priti Yadav Vs M/S Naman Communications

Bhajjan Kaur Vs State

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Nand Kumar & Ors.

Abhimanyu @ Monu @ Molad Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Sameer Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi