Second regular bail application in a murder case (FIR No. 61/2020) was withdrawn by the petitioner with a prayer for expeditious trial. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn and requested the trial court to complete the trial preferably within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
SHUBHAM SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Grover & Mr. Siddharth Pandit, Advs.
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State. SI Deepak Dhanda, P.S. Govind Puri & Insp. Mukesh Kumar, SHO Preet Vihar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
% 10.01.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:20:01
AMIT SHARMA, J
JANUARY 10, 2025/ nk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:20:01
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS should be granted, or whether it should be withdrawn with a direction for expeditious trial.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Shubham Sharma
State (NCT of Delhi)
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
