Bail application withdrawn after cognizance was taken by the trial court; the High Court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
SHANTI SWAROOP SATIJA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sarita Sharma, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 14.07.2025
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that since cognizance has been taken by learned Trial Court, she be permitted to withdraw the present Bail Application.
2. In view of submissions made, Bail Application is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. Pending Application, if any, also stands disposed of.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
JULY 14, 2025/ R
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 11:41:25
Shanti Swaroop Satija
State of NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
