Bail application withdrawn by the petitioner before arguments concluded, with liberty to file afresh after examination of an eye witness in the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~78
PARTH GUPTA THROUGH PAROKAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Ujjwal Arora and Mr. Pulkit Choudhary, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Adv. Inspector Naresh and SI Bunty Drall
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
O R D E R % 17.12.2025
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh after the examination of the eye witness before the learned Trial Court.
2. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending application(s), if any, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J
DECEMBER 17, 2025 /ar
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/12/2025 at 11:46:50
Parth Gupta through Parokar
State NCT of Delhi
Ajay Digpaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
