Sanjay Kumar Manjhi Vs State NCT of Delhi

¶1

$~5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 4501/2024, CRL. M.A. 36809/2024

¶4

SANJAY KUMAR MANJHI .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. S.P. Sharma, Mr. Harsh Sharma and Mr. Abhishek Vashist, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Dharambir, ASI and Mr. Parmjeet, SI, PS-Ranhola. Mr. B. Shankar Yadav, Mr. Juber Ahmad and Ms. Monika, Advocates for Complainant.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 07.01.2025

¶11

Through the present application, the Applicant seeks anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita [‘ BNSS’ ], 2023 in case FIR No. 0696/2024 dated 25^th September, 2024 under Section 306/498A/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1890 registered at P.S. Ranhola, Delhi.

¶12

The case of the prosecution is as follows:

¶13

2.1. On 27^th April, 2024, upon receiving a PCR call, the IO along with staff reached the spot, where they found a lady hanging from a ceiling fan. A two-page suicide note was also found on the spot. The postmortem

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/01/2025 at 17:33:14

¶16

conducted and cause of death was attributed to the hanging. Thereafter, a written complaint was made wherein allegations have been made against the in laws of the deceased. In the complaint, it has been alleged that the deceased, Smt. Rima Kumari, was being pressurised for dowry by her husband, her in laws, as well as the girl friend of her husband, which led to her committing suicide. Allegations of domestic violence have also been made against the husband. She has left behind one daughter who is now in the custody of parents of the deceased.

¶17

2.2. Specifically, the incident dated 11^th April, 2024, is highlighted where the husband of the deceased beat her up when he came to know that the deceased had made call to his girlfriend. The Suicide note specifically mentioned the name of Ajay Kumar Manjhi (husband), Ramita Devi (Mother-in-law), Dhaneshwar Kumar Manjhi (Father-in-law), Sanjay Kumar Manjhi (brother-in-law), Poonam (wife of Sanjay Manjhi), Shardha Kumari (sister-in-law) and Naveen Bharti (alleged girlfriend of Ajay Manjhi). The Applicant i.e., Sanjay Kumar Manjhi, brother-in-law of the deceased, has thus been specifically named in the suicide note. As regards the Applicant the Deceased, in the suicide note, has made an allegation that with common planning of all family members she was harassed.

¶18

In view of the above and the serious nature of allegations made, the APP strongly opposes the Applicant’s request for grant of bail. 4. The Court has considered the aforenoted contentions. On 12^th December, 2024, the Court while granting interim protection to the Applicant had directed him to join the investigation as and when directed by the IO. Since then, the Applicant has appeared before the IO on 15^th December, 2024. Furthermore, the Applicant undertakes to cooperate in the

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/01/2025 at 17:33:14

¶21

investigation and continuously appear before the IO as and when directed.

¶22

It is also pointed out that the husband of the deceased and his alleged girlfriend are presently in judicial custody. The chargesheet has been filed against the husband, his alleged girlfriend, as well as his parents. The names of parents are mentioned in column No. 12 of the chargesheet. As far as the Applicant is concerned, who is the brother-in-law of the deceased, it has been pointed out that he has been living separately from his brother for last ten years. The marriage between the deceased and her husband took place on 28^th November, 2013. Furthermore, in the suicide note, there is no specific allegation against the Applicant except for mentioning his name.

¶23

It is not in doubt that an order for grant of Anticipatory bail cannot be passed in a routine manner. At the same time, it cannot be denied that great amount of humiliation and disgrace is attached with the arrest. In cases where the accused has joined investigation and is cooperating with the Investigating Agency and is not likely to abscond, custodial interrogation should be avoided.

¶24

In light of the foregoing, the application is allowed. Consequently, the Applicant, in the event of arrest, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25, 000/- with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/IO/SHO concerned, on the following conditions:

¶25

a. The Applicant shall join and cooperate with the investigation as and when directed by the IO;

¶26

b. The Applicant shall not leave the country without informing the IO/ SHO concerned;

¶27

c. The Applicant shall not influence any witness/complainant/victim or

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/01/2025 at 17:33:14

¶30

tamper with evidence of the case.

¶31

d. The Applicant shall not visit or venture anywhere in the vicinity of the victim’s house and the victim’s family members.

¶32

e. The Applicant shall also furnish proof of his residence to the concerned IO;

¶33

It is clarified that any observations made in the present order are for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and should not influence the outcome of the trial and also not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

¶34

Accordingly, the bail application along with pending applications, if any, is disposed of.

¶35

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶36

JANUARY 7, 2025 nk

¶37

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/01/2025 at 17:33:14

Sanjay Kumar Manjhi v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar Manjhi v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajinder Kumar Jain Vs Union of India & Anr.

Satyawati Dubey Vs Kusum Dubey and Anr.

Zubair Ahmed Abbasi Vs Bar Council of India

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Vs Akshay Kumar Malhotra

Daya Kishan Chauhan Vs the State of NCT Ofdelhi

Poonam Devi Vs the State Gnct of Delhi