Petitioner sought withdrawal of a bail application with liberty to file afresh if four witnesses were not examined within six weeks. The court granted the prayer and dismissed the application as withdrawn. No merits were decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
| + BAIL APPLN. 4246/2024 |
|
|---|---|
| S | .....Petitioner |
| Through: | Mr. Satyam Thareja, Adv. |
| versus | (DHCLSC) with Mr. Shaurya Katoch and Ms. Shikhar Yadav, Advs. |
| STATE (NCT OF DELHI) | .....Respondent |
| Through: | Ms. Meenaskshi Dahiya, APP |
| for State with SI Atul |
|
| Prabhakar, P.S. Okhla |
|
| Industrial Area. | |
| Mr. Harshvardhan Jain and Ms. | |
| Shivanjali Bhalerao, Advs. for victim. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R
% 17.04.2025
SHALINDER KAUR, J
APRIL 17, 2025/ sds /km
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2025 at 11:43:13
S
State (NCT of Delhi)
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
