Applicant granted bail earlier could not furnish two sureties and remained in custody. Relying on the Supreme Court's policy on grant of bail, the Court relaxed conditions and directed release on a personal bond without sureties, other conditions unchanged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JANAK SINGH @ BABLU .....Applicant Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Adv. versus STATE (THROUGH NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with SI Sunil Dutt, PS Parsad Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 01.05.2025
CRL.M.A. 13333/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:21:32
sureties for a sum of ₹50,000/-. He submits that due to the same, the applicant is still languishing in custody.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
MAY 1, 2025 ‘KDK’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:21:32
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail conditions requiring two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each could be relaxed where the applicant could not furnish them.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
In Re : Policy Strategy for Grant of BailRelied on¶4
2023 SCC OnLine SC 483 · Who else cites this
JANAK SINGH @ BABLU
STATE (THROUGH NCT OF DELHI)
AMIT MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
