Dismissed

Vijay Alias Vinod v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC1 May 2025BAIL APPLN./395/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under the POCSO Act, the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the petitioner. The court directed the trial court to conclude the evidence expeditiously and noted assurances from the prosecution for no further adjournments.

What did the court decide?

The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner, with liberty to file a fresh application if the trial is unduly delayed.

Vijay Alias Vinod Vs the State Govt of NCT of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~5

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 395/2025 VIJAY ALIAS VINOD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. B.S. Yadav, Adv.

¶4

versus

¶5

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State. SI Pinki, PS Sultanpuri, Ms. Arpita Srivastava & Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advs. for victim along with victim and her mother in person.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 01.05.2025

¶7

The learned counsel for the applicant, at the outset, submits that since all the public witnesses have been examined and only 10 formal witnesses are remaining to be examined, he is hopeful that recording of the evidence would conclude within a period of 6 to 10 months.

¶8

He seeks liberty to withdraw the present application and take all arguments before the learned Trial Court and file an application afresh if the trial is unduly delayed.

¶9

In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶10

Section 35(2) of the POCSO Act mandates trial for offence under POCSO Act to be concluded in a time bound manner. The learned Trial Court is, therefore, expected to conclude the recording of the evidence expeditiously.

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:04:15

¶13

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State also assures that formal witnesses would be produced on the date fixed before the learned Trial Court and no unwarranted adjournment would be taken.

¶14

This Court also appreciates the effort put in by the learned Amicus Ms. Arpita Srivastava, who represented the victim on the request of the Court.

¶15

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶16

MAY 1, 2025 “SK”

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:04:15

Vijay Alias Vinod v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Alias Vinod v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State Vs Iqbal Hussain & Anr.

Umar @ Chotu Vs State Gnct of Delhi

Rocky Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Anshika & Anr. Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Saddak Vs State NCT of Delhi

Smt Sushila Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.