Applicant sought pre-arrest bail in an FIR under Sections 64(2)/89/351(2) BNS. Counsel sought liberty to withdraw and approach the Sessions Court; the application was disposed of with that liberty, without observations on merits.
Liberty granted to withdraw the application and file afresh before the Court of Sessions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State. SI Sargam Bhardwaj, PS Adarsh Nagar.
Ms. Jyoti Chib, Mr. Rohit Dubey & Mr. Abhinav Sagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R
% 11.09.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2025 at 12:23:39
observations on the merits of the case and as and when any such application is filed, the same shall be considered by the learned Trial Court on its own merits without being influenced by the filing of the present application.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2025 at 12:23:39
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shubham Sharma
State of NCT Delhi
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
