Rinku Singh Vs the State NCT of Delhi

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 2952/2025 RINKU SINGH .....Applicant Through: Dr. Manish Aggarwal, Mr. Amit Ambawat, Ms. Priyanka Verma, Ms. Shilpa Kumari & Ms. Divya Chaudhary, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State SI Sunil & SI Chetan, PSPaschim Vihar West.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R

¶7

% 08.09.2025

¶8

The present application is filed seeking regular bail in FIR No. 204/2025 dated 12.05.2025, registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar West for the offences under Sections 110/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶9

The FIR was registered on a complaint given by one Ajay Singh. It is alleged that on 25.04.2025, the complainant had gone to DDA Park, Jwalapuri to attend a Panchayat of his society in relation to a dispute pertaining to his sister. It is alleged that thereafter the opposite party suddenly started quarrelling with the complainant and his family members. It is further alleged that the applicant alongwith the other co-accused persons assaulted the complainant as a consequence of which the complainant sustained injuries.

¶10

It is pointed out that the complainant and the applicant are related to each other and have already settled their disputes. It is

¶11

Page 1 of 3

¶12

BAIL APPLN. 2952/2025

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2025 at 12:01:24

¶15

further pointed out that the complainant does not wish to pursue any proceedings arising out of the present FIR.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that another petition has also been filed seeking quashing of FIR on the ground of settlement.

¶17

The complainant is present in person in Court and on being asked, he states that all the disputes have already been resolved between the parties and that he has no objection if the applicant is released on bail.

¶18

Considering that the parties have already settled their disputes, no purpose would be served by subjecting the applicant to further custody.

¶19

In view of the above, the present application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of ₹20,000/- with one surety of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, on the following conditions:

¶20

a. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case or tamper with the evidence of the case, in any manner whatsoever;

¶21

b. The applicant shall under no circumstance leave the country without the permission of the learned Trial Court;

¶22

c. The applicant shall appear before the learned Trial Court as and when directed;

¶23

d. The applicant shall provide the address where he would be residing after his release and shall not change the address without informing the concerned IO/ SHO;

¶24

Page 2 of 3

¶25

BAIL APPLN. 2952/2025

¶26

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2025 at 12:01:24

¶27

e. The applicant shall, upon his release, give his mobile number to the concerned IO/SHO and shall keep his mobile phone switched on at all times.

¶28

In the event of there being any FIR/DD entry/complaint lodged against the applicant, it would be open to the respondent to seek redressal by filing an application seeking cancellation of bail.

¶29

It is clarified that any observations made in the present order are for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and should not influence the outcome of the trial and also not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

¶30

The bail application is allowed in the aforementioned terms.

¶31

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶32

SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 “SS”

¶33

Page 3 of 3

¶34

BAIL APPLN. 2952/2025

¶35

This is a digitally signed order.

¶36

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2025 at 12:01:24

Rinku Singh v. the State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinku Singh v. the State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jugal Kishore & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mohit Bidhuri & Ors. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.

Naveen @ Ghoda Vs State(Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Sandeep Rana Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Suresh Vs State NCT of Delhi

Kshitij Bhuvan Sinha & Ors. Vs State (Govt. of N.C.T. Delhi) & Anr.