Regular bail application in a dowry death case was withdrawn by the petitioner after part submissions. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn and requested the trial court to expedite recording of prosecution witnesses, only four of 38 having been examined so far.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
NAVEEN DABAS .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Urvashi Bhatia, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Taran Srivastav, APP with Inspector Narender, PS Nangloi
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 10.10.2025
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
OCTOBER 10, 2025
RM
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2025 at 12:49:06
1 issue framed by the court
Should the petitioner be granted regular bail in FIR No. 246/2023 under Sections 498-A/304-B IPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naveen Dabas
State (NCT of Delhi)
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
