Delhi High Court allowed regular bail for an applicant in IPC offences. Court noted investigation is complete, trial will take considerable time, and applicant made out a case for bail without appearing to be a flight risk.
Released on bail via personal bond with two sureties of ₹20,000 each subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
AKASH KUMAR .....Applicant Through: Mr. U.A. Khan, Tushar Upadhyaya, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State. SI Amit Beniwal, PS M.S. Park.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 29.07.2025
BAIL APPLN. 2375/2025
Page 1 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2025 at 13:25:37
a. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case or tamper with the evidence of the case, in any manner whatsoever;
Page 2 of 3
BAIL APPLN. 2375/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2025 at 13:25:37
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
JULY 29, 2025 “SK”
Page 3 of 3
BAIL APPLN. 2375/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2025 at 13:25:37
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering the trial is likely to take a considerable period of time.
Whether the applicant's claim that process‑server could not serve NBW as he was in custody is prima facie meritorious.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
AKASH KUMAR
STATE NCT OF DELHI
AMIT MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
