Disposed¶19

Shailender Kumar Shaw v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC7 Jul 2025BAIL APPLN./2235/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim bail extension on medical grounds; Ankylosing Spondylitis; petitioner confined to bed; status report and IO confirmation; genuineness of medical documents verified by IO before Trial Court; 60-day extension subject to previous terms; clean-hands objection regarding hospitalization dates (Kothari Medical Centre, Kolkata; admitted 12.06.2025, discharged 17.06.2025); State of NCT of Delhi, Crime Branch; Delhi High Court; Bail Appln. 2235/2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail extended for a period of 60 days, subject to the previous terms and conditions. ¶19

Shailender Kumar Shaw Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 2235/2025

¶4

SHAILENDER KUMAR SHAW .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Ravi Ketan Bhardwaj, Mr. Akash Bhardwaj and Mr. Grazy Singh, Advs. versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh, SPP with ACP Arvind Kumar and SI Amit Chaudhary, Crime Branch.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

¶8

O R D E R % 07.07.2025

¶9

The learned special prosecutor places on record the status report. The same is taken on record.

¶10

The learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is suffering with incurable, deadly and life threatening illness i.e., Ankylosing Spondylitis. It is stated that in this medical condition all the body joints get locked and the person becomes immobile.

¶11

It is further submitted that petitioner is under treatment and is being made to do regular exercise and therapies to control the disease. It is stated that, at present, the petitioner’s whole body is paralysed. There is pain and stiffness in the body.

¶12

The learned special prosecutor submits that petitioner has not approached the court with clean hands, inasmuch as, on the last date his

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/07/2025 at 11:56:23

¶14

counsel informed the Court that petitioner was lying admitted in Kothari Medical Centre Hospital in Kolkata, whereas the medical record received from the treating hospital categorically mentions that petitioner was admitted on12.06.2025 and was discharged on 17.06.2025 and thus, he was not hospitalized on the day of the last hearing in this matter.

¶15

The status report filed by the learned special prosecutor confirms the medical condition of the petitioner. The IO present in Court further confirms that at the time of his visit, he found the petitioner confined to bed.

¶16

Petitioner has placed on record the treatment record ( Annexure P-5 and Annexure P-6 ).

¶17

In his report before the learned Trial Court, the IO verified the genuineness of the medical documents.

¶18

Considering the status of the medical condition of the petitioner, his interim bail is extended for a period of 60 days, subject to the previous terms and conditions.

¶19

In view of the above, the present application/petition is disposed of.

¶20

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J

¶21

JULY 7, 2025 Sky/na

¶22

Shailender Kumar Shaw v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailender Kumar Shaw v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhasish Mitra Vs M/S Hero Fincorp Ltd.

Hiragal Abdul Hafiz Vs State of Delhi

Kuldeep Singh Vs State of Gnct of Delhi & Anr.

Sandeep & Anr. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Gulshan Kumar Batra & Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Aman and Others Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.