Dismissed

Ashif @ Faisal v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Delhi HC1 Jul 2025BAIL APPLN./2200/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused sought interim bail citing an anal fissure requiring treatment. A medical status report indicated treatment was available at the hospital attached to the jail. The petitioner withdrew the application, which was dismissed as withdrawn with directions to jail authorities to begin medical treatment.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; jail authorities directed to initiate medical treatment; liberty to approach Sessions Court for further relief.

Ashif @ Faisal Vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi) — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~43

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 2200/2025

¶4

ASHIF @ FAISAL .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Pankaj Kapoor, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Bahri, Mr. Aniket Arora and Mr. Shikhar Singh, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶8

O R D E R % 01.07.2025

¶9

The accused/applicant seeks interim bail in case FIR No. 354/2022 of PS Hari Nagar for offence under Section 307/302/120B/34 IPC and 25/27 Arms Act.

¶10

In furtherance of last order, learned APP submits that she has received Medical Status Report from jail and shall file the same during the course of the day. The Status Report is accepted across the board, to be scanned and made a part of the record. Copy already supplied.

¶11

According to the detailed Status Report, the accused/applicant is suffering from the problem of fissure in anus and for that, he can be appropriately treated at DDU Hospital, attached with the jail. Learned APP submits that State shall ensure best possible medical treatment to the accused/applicant but for that purpose, he be not granted interim bail in view of the nature of allegations.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 12:32:11

¶13

In view of above circumstances, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks passover to obtain instructions.

¶14

As requested, be awaited.

¶15

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶16

JULY 1, 2025/ DR

¶17

In this post-lunch session, having obtained instructions from his client, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application. The application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the directions to the jail authorities to initiate medical treatment of the accused/applicant tomorrow itself. Further, as requested, if need be, the accused/applicant shall have liberty to approach the Court of Sessions for any further relief in accordance with law.

¶18

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶19

JULY 1, 2025 ‘ rs’

¶20

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶21

Ashif @ Faisal v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashif @ Faisal v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal Dagar & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Rubel Abbasi Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Dr Anjali Vinocha (through Her Authorized Representative Dr Arun Wadhawan) Vs Delhi State Cancer Institute and Anr.

Mr.Chetan Anand & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sheikh Samad @ Lambu Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Chetan Dalal Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.