Disposed

Mohd Munawwar Alam v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC23 May 2025BAIL APPLN./1991/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An accused in FIR No. 226/2024 (PS Jamia Nagar) sought interim bail or custody parole to appear in the UPSC examination at Patna on 25.05.2025. The court granted interim bail with a Rs. 20,000 personal bond and one surety, barring contact with the victim, and required surrender by 27.05.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of like amount; no contact with victim; surrender by 27.05.2025, 4:00 PM.

Mohd Munawwar Alam Vs State NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~73

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1991/2025

¶4

MOHD MUNAWWAR ALAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratyush Prasanna and Ms. Saumya Yadav, Advocates

¶5

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for State with Mr. Nitin Kumar Poswal and Mr. Gaurav Chaudhary, Advocates.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

% 23.05.2025

¶9

CRL.M.A. 16212/2025 (exemption)

¶10

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

Application stands disposed of.

¶12

BAIL APPLN. 1991/2025

¶13

By way of the present application, the applicant seeks grant of interim bail in case FIR No. 226/2024, registered at Police Station Jamia Nagar, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 307/354D/109/419/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC' ).

¶14

Issue notice. Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, the learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

¶15

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks either custody parole or interim bail, for the applicant herein, on the ground that he

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:22:34

¶17

has to appear for UPSC Examination. It is stated that the said examination is to take place on 25.05.2025 and his centre is at Patna, Bihar.

¶18

This Court has heard arguments addressed on behalf of the applicant and has perused the material available on record. 7. During the course of hearing, this Court inquired from the learned counsel for the applicant as to why the present application has been moved at the eleventh hour, especially when only one day remains for the applicant to travel to Patna, Bihar, for appearing in the examination. In response, the learned counsel continued to press for an urgent order to be passed today. This Court is however of the considered opinion that any delay or negligence on the part of a litigant in approaching the Court in a timely manner should not be allowed to convert into an emergent situation for the Court, when the parties want other cases to be left aside and their case be attended to first, on priority basis. Be that as it may, considering the fact that the applicant is seeking interim bail solely for the purpose of appearing in the UPSC Examination scheduled for 25.05.2025, which he is attempting for the fourth time (as informed to this Court), and since his examination centre is situated at Patna, this Court is inclined to grant interim bail to the applicant.

¶19

The applicant shall be released on interim bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety bond of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/Successor Court/Link Court/Duty Judge concerned. The applicant will not either by himself or by any means including physically and electronically try to contact the victim or her family. Since he has to appear for his examination on 25.05.2025, he shall surrender before the Jail Authorities on 27.05.2025

¶20

¶21

by 4:00 PM.

¶22

Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of, in above terms.

¶23

It is, however, clarified that nothing expressed herein above shall tantamount to an expression of opinion on merits of the case.

¶24

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

¶25

DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J

¶26

MAY 23, 2025/zp

¶27

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶28

Mohd Munawwar Alam v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Munawwar Alam v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Bhardwaj Vs Smt Dipti Bhardwaj

Vivek Sharma Vs Smriti Sharma

Arshad Mujahid Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors. & Anr.

Ajay Kumar Vs the State Govt. Ofnct of Delhi and Anr.

Mustakim Miya@Muskan Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Ahamad Jan Sidhiq Vs Narcotics Control Bureau