Disposed¶23

Akshit Gilhotra v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC7 Apr 2025BAIL APPLN./1363/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS; no FIR registered; statutory notice three days in advance after FIR registration; Complaint No. 280/SHO Bawana dated 20.03.2025; Police Station Bawana; State of NCT of Delhi; Delhi High Court; Shalinder Kaur, J; application disposed; APP concession; Akshit Gilhotra.

What did the court decide?

Direction that a statutory notice, as per law, be given to the petitioner at least three days in advance after registration of FIR; the bail application stands disposed of accordingly. ¶23

Akshit Gilhotra Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~52

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1363/2025

¶4

AKSHIT GILHOTRA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Ms. Poonam Sharma and Mr. Kunal Tyagi, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent

¶8

Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

¶11

O R D E R % 07.04.2025

¶12

CRL.M.A. 10572/2025, CRL.M.A. 10573/2025 (Exemption)

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

Applications stand disposed of.

¶15

BAIL APPLN. 1363/2025

¶16

The present petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), has been filed by the petitioner for grant of Anticipatory Bail in Complaint No. 280/SHO Bawana dated 20.03.2025 registered at Police Station Bawana, New Delhi.

¶17

Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though he has filed the present application seeking anticipatory bail but till date no FIR has been registered against him, therefore, he

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:39:02

¶20

limits his relief only to the extent that he should be given a statutory notice, as per law.

¶21

Mr. Raghuinder Verma, the learned APP, also concedes to the above submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

¶22

In view of the submissions made, a statutory notice, as per law, be given to the petitioner, at least three days in advance, after registration of FIR, in the present case.

¶23

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

¶24

SHALINDER KAUR, J

¶25

APRIL 7, 2025 SU/KP

¶26

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:39:02

Akshit Gilhotra v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akshit Gilhotra v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rizwan Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Hansraj Vs the State (Govt of Nct, Delhi)

Krishan Kumar Sharma Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Kenneth C. Iheze Vs State NCT of Delhi

Manoj Chaturvedi Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Vijay Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) through SHO of Ps Uttam Nagar