Bail applicant in custody over four years sought release; counsel instead sought withdrawal with liberty to file afresh if trial delayed. Application dismissed as withdrawn; trial court requested to expedite evidence recording and conclude trial within 8-10 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
SHIV KUMAR @KANAK .....Applicant
Through: Mr. Hemant Kumar & Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advs.
versus
THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI THROUGH S .H.O P.S SUBHASH PLACE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Gahlot, APP for the State. Insp. Dheeraj Yadav, PS Subhash Place.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R
% 04.04.2025 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody for last more than four years. He submits that the applicant will be satisfied if the trial is expedited.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
APRIL 4, 2025 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/06/2025 at 23:55:36
SHIV KUMAR @KANAK
THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI THROUGH S.H.O P.S SUBHASH PLACE
AMIT MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
