Dismissed¶20

Rakesh v. the State of Govt of Delhi

Delhi HC17 Jul 2025BAIL APPLN./1051/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court bail application withdrawn with liberty: BAIL APPLN. 1051/2025, RAKESH v. THE STATE OF GOVT OF DELHI, Judge Girish Kathpalia, order dated 17.07.2025. Counsel absent through multiple passovers; proxy counsel sought further passes; APP Mr. Amit Ahlawat for State (Inspector Bijay Kumar, PS Bawana; Inspector Anupam Bhushan, Supreme Court Security); complainant represented by Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva and Ms. Ritika. Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh before the Trial Court after testimony of last public witness Pulkit concludes.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the bail application with liberty to file afresh before the Trial Court subsequent to the conclusion of testimony of last public witness Pulkit. ¶20

Rakesh Vs the State of Govt of Delhi — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1051/2025 RAKESH .....Petitioner Through: None. versus THE STATE OF GOVT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Bijay Kumar, PS Bawana and Inspector Anupam Bhushan, Supreme Court Security. Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva and Ms. Ritika, Advocates for Complainant.

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶5

O R D E R % 17.07.2025

¶6

Since none appears for accused/applicant, matter is passed over.

¶7

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶8

JULY 17, 2025/as

¶9

Present : Ms. Chetishtha, proxy counsel for accused/applicant. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Bijay Kumar, PS Bawana and Inspector Anupam Bhushan, Supreme Court Security.

¶10

Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva and Ms. Ritika, Advocates for Complainant.

¶11

Even in second call arguing counsel for the accused/applicant has not appeared and the proxy counsel seeks one more passover. Learned APP for State objects to such request, submitting that in the case of the co-accused also, the bail application was repeatedly got adjourned by the counsel.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2025 at 11:43:27

¶14

Despite heavy board of this Court, matter is again passed over awaiting arguing counsel for the accused/applicant.

¶15

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶16

JULY 17, 2025/as

¶17

Present: Ms. Swati Rathi, Ms. Chetishtha Malik, Mr. Prem Sood, and Luv Sharma, Advocates for Petitioner. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Bijay Kumar, PS Bawana and Inspector Anupam Bhushan, Supreme Court Security.

¶18

Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Advocate for Complainant.

¶19

In continuance of order dated 24.04.2025, learned counsel for the accused/applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file afresh before the Trial Court subsequent to the conclusion of testimony of last public witness Pulkit.

¶20

The application is dismissed as withdraw with liberty as sought.

¶21

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶22

JULY 17, 2025/ DR

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2025 at 11:43:27

Rakesh v. the State of Govt of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh v. the State of Govt of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankit Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Bhupinderjit Singh @Lucky Nagpal @Manmeet Kaur @ Manveer Vs State NCT of Delhi

Sandeep Dahiya Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Ability Dodzi @ Chinazom Ability Vs State NCT of Delhi

Ravinder Singh @ Ravi Vs State (through Govt. NCT of Delhi)

Nitin and Another Vs the State and Another