part of the Promoters Group and Investor Group is patently false and, therefore, the Order dated 16.04.2019 by which the learned ASJ cancelled the bail granted to the Petitioner herein, cannot be sustained as there was no material before the learned ASJ to affirm that the Petitioner is a Promoter or a full time Director or a shareholder of ANB. He states that as far as the reasoning given by the learned ASJ while cancelling the bail of the Petitioner herein that the Petitioner has concealed the order dated 11.10.2017, whereby learned Sessions Court had rejected his application for anticipatory bail, is concerned, the learned Duty MM while granting bail to the Petitioner had referred to the order dated 11.10.2017 and, therefore, it cannot be said that the learned Duty MM was not aware of the fact that the Petitioner's Application for anticipatory bail had been rejected by the Sessions Court. He, therefore, states that there was no material suppression on the part of the Petitioner. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner also contends that the investigation was going on in a haphazard manner and it was the Petitioner who filed a Writ Petition for the purpose of forensic audit of ANB to help the investigation. He states that out of Rs.25 crores which were transferred from the account of ANB to the accounts of different companies, namely, M/s Athena Cityscapes Pvt. Ltd., Blue River Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., M/s Spire Techpark, M/s Fountain Head, M/s Viridian Development Management, etc. Rs.22 crores have been brought back to ANB. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner further states that all the evidence in the present matter is documentary in nature and the EoW is already in possession of all the documents of the ANB and, therefore, there is no apprehension that the Petitioner can tamper with evidence. He further states that the Petitioner has joined investigation as and when he has been
