Inox Green Energy Services Limited Vs Jath Wind Energy Private Limited

By way of present petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘A&C Act’ ), the petitioner seeks constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a panel of three Arbitrators, to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties had entered into an Operation and Maintenance Agreement dated 26.10.2013, Clause 22.2 of the Operation and Maintenance Agreement dated 26.10.2013 and Clause 11 of the Shared Services Order dated 26.10.2013 stipulates resolution of disputes through arbitration and further designates New Delhi to be the seat of arbitration.

¶12

He further states that disputes having arisen between the parties, a notice invoking arbitration dated 09.10.2024 was issued by the petitioner to the respondent under Section 21 of the A&C Act, to which response has been received on 05.11.2024.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2025 at 17:21:27

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has also separately invoked arbitration and further submits that it has no objection to referring the disputes to arbitration.

¶15

Learned counsels for the parties, on instructions, submit that a sole Arbitrator be appointed instead of a panel of three as envisaged in the subject Agreement.

¶16

Considering that both the parties have consented to the reference of the disputes to the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a sole Arbitrator, the present petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶17

i) The disputes between the parties under the said agreement are referred to the Arbitral Tribunal.

¶18

ii) Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy, former Judge Supreme Court of India (Mob:7578010196) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶19

iii) he arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’). The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators’ Fees) Rules, 2018 or as the parties may agree.

¶20

iv) The learned Arbitrator shall furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the A&C Act prior to entering into the reference.

¶21

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including on the existence and validity of the Arbitration agreement, arbitrability of any of the claim/counter claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as contentions on merits of the dispute by either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned

¶22

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2025 at 17:21:27

¶23

arbitrator.

¶24

vi) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶25

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶26

FEBRUARY 6, 2025/ rd

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2025 at 17:21:27

Inox Green Energy Services Limited v. Jath Wind Energy Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Inox Green Energy Services Limited v. Jath Wind Energy Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cars 24 Financial Services Private Limited Vs Mayank Khanna Proprietor of M/S Auto Heaven & Anr.

M/S Doons Caterers Vs Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. & Ors.

Snap on Tools Private Limited Vs Ventus Autocraft Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Ramacivil India Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

National Highway Authority of India through Authorized Representative Sh Sachin Kumar Gautam Vs Longjian Road and Bridge Limited Co.

Inox Green Energy Services Limited Vs Nilgiri Power Private Limited