Ncc Premco Jv through Its Authorized Representative Vs Rail Vikas Nigam Limited

By way of present petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘A&C Act’ ), petitioner seeks appointment of Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three Arbitrators, to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties had entered into a General Contract Agreement dated 22.05.2013 and Clause 20.3 of the same stipulates resolution of disputes with respect to the Agreement through arbitration. The Clause further provides for the place of arbitration to be at New Delhi. The petition is accompanied with notice under Section 21 of the A&C Act issued on 25.11.2024.

¶13

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that though he has certain objections to the appointment, without prejudice to its rights and contentions, in case the Court is inclined to refer the dispute to arbitration, he seeks liberty that all contentions and objections remain open to be urged

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2025 at 11:45:05

¶15

before the Arbitral Tribunal so constituted.

¶16

In terms of Clause 20.3.2 of the subject Agreement, the reference is to be made to an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three Arbitrators, where the petitioner and the respondent shall each appoint one Arbitrator and such appointed Arbitrators shall appoint the Presiding Arbitrator. Learned counsel for the petitioner states, upon instructions, that the petitioner has proposed the name of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sri N.R.L. Nageswara Rao, Former Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court as its nominee Arbitrator.

¶17

At this stage, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent appoints Hon’ble Ms. Justice R. Banumathi, Former Judge of the Supreme Court of India as its nominee Arbitrator.

¶18

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶19

i) Mr. Justice Sri N.R.L. Nageswara Rao, former Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court (Mob. No.9959377667) and Ms. Justice R. Banumathi, former Judge of the Supreme Court of India (Mob. No. 7042955477) are appointed as the Arbitrators who shall choose and appoint the Presiding Arbitrator, to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶20

ii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’). The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators’ Fees) Rules, 2018 or as the parties may agree.

¶21

iii) The learned Arbitrators shall furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2025 at 11:45:06

¶24

iv) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including on the existence and validity of the Arbitration agreement, arbitrability of any of the claim/counter claim, any other preliminary objection, need and legality of interim relief, as well as contentions on merits of the dispute by either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned Arbitrator.

¶25

v) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrators within four weeks from today.

¶26

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶27

MARCH 10, 2025/ rd

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2025 at 11:45:06

Ncc Premco Jv through Its Authorized Representative v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ncc Premco Jv through Its Authorized Representative v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Antony Road Transport Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sphaira Transport Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Cars 24 Financial Services Private Limited Vs Lakshay Sharma Proprietor of M/S Harshiv Motors & Anr.

M/S Shiv and Sons Vs Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation

Garuda Maverick Infrastructure Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sammaan Capital Ltd.

Profin Capital Services Limited Vs Nivaya Resources Private Limited