Section 11(6) petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator under a 2016 MoU. Parties entered a new arrangement, and the petitioner withdrew the petition, which was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
MS PVR LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikramjeet Singh, Deputy Manager, Legal
versus
MS PKS BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarun Singla & Mr. Kailash Chandra Joshi, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 14:48:19
XXIII Rule 1(3) of CPC will not apply.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
FEBRUARY 3, 2025 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 14:48:19
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MS PVR LIMITED
MS PKS BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
