Disposed

M/S Brijesh Kumar and Associates v. Delhi Development Authority

Delhi HC13 Nov 2025ARB.P./1452/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought correction of an arbitration appointment order: supply of the Sole Arbitrator's address and deletion of paragraphs relating to institutional arbitration, the reference being to an existing adhoc Arbitral Tribunal. The court modified paragraph 4, deleted paragraphs 5 and 6, and disposed of the application.

What did the court decide?

Paragraph 4 of order dated 13.11.2025 modified to include arbitrator's address; paragraphs 5 and 6 deleted.

M/S Brijesh Kumar and Associates Vs Delhi Development Authority — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~70

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 1452/2025

¶4

M/S BRIJESH KUMAR AND ASSOCIATES .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapoor, Mr. Ashit Kapoor Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Lochan Mahunta & Mr.Pratyush Mishra, Advocates for DDA

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 18.12.2025

¶12

I.A. 31797/2025

¶13

This is an application on behalf of the Petitioner seeking correction/modification of the Order dated 13.11.2025 passed by this Court. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that Paragraph 4 of the Order dated 13.11.2025 does not provide the address of the learned Arbitrator.

¶14

By way of the present application, the Petitioner has supplied the address of the learned Arbitrator. Therefore, Paragraph No.4 of the Order dated 13.11.2025 is modified accordingly and the same will now read as under:-

¶15

“4. Accordingly, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Agrawal, Retd. Special Director General, CPWD, A-15, Upper Ground Floor, South Extension Part – II, New Delhi 110 019 having e-mail id: [email protected]

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/12/2025 at 14:19:47

¶18

and Mobile No.: 7542030167, is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties.”

¶19

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner also contends that the present dispute has been referred to the existing Arbitral Tribunal which was an adhoc arbitration and not an institutional arbitration and therefore Paragraph 5 and 6 of the Order dated 13.11.2025 has to be deleted from the said Order. 5. In view of the fact that the matter has been referred to an existing Arbitral Tribunal, Paragraph No.5 and 6 of the Order dated 13.11.2025 is superfluous in nature and therefore stands deleted from the said Order. 6. With these observations, the application is disposed of.

¶20

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶21

DECEMBER 18, 2025 hsk

¶22

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/12/2025 at 14:19:47

M/S Brijesh Kumar and Associates v. Delhi Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Brijesh Kumar and Associates v. Delhi Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arcelormittal Nippon Steel India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mideast Integrated Steel Ltd.

M/S Coders Brain Technology Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Engineer.Ai India Pvt. Ltd.

Globe Civil Projects Limited Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi

M/S Skyline Air Conditioning Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

Sri Parameshwari Tele Infra Vs M/S Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Vlcc Healthcare Limited Vs Azad Ahmad Dar