The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to be withdrawn due to the filing of irrelevant documents unrelated to the respondent. The court deprecated the approach and imposed costs on the petitioners.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; petitioners directed to pay costs of Rs.20,000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ 244
versus
EX SEP KARTAR SINGH NO 10495550W .....Respondent Through: Mr.Ravi Kumar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R
% 18.03.2025
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
MARCH 18, 2025/sg/SJ
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 21:44:53
Union of India
Ex Sep Kartar Singh
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
