Revision petition challenged on maintainability under the proviso to Section 115 CPC; petitioner sought leave to withdraw with liberty to file an appropriate petition, which was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Divya Verma and Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Advs.
versus
SCINDIA INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Rohan and Mr. Jai Dogra, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
APRIL 4, 2025/r
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 10:51:02
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Scindia Potteries and Services Private Limited
Scindia Investments Private Limited
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
