Single judge order granting a correction application to amend a typographical error in a prior judgment and providing procedural directions.
Correction of paragraph 13 of the judgment dated 08.04.2025 and directions for appearance before the Labour Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
versus
SH. VINAY KUMAR SINGH .....Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R % 09.05.2025
CM APPL. 28332/2025 [For correction of typographical error]
“13. In view of the aforegoing circumstances, this Court find that the Petitioner has shown sufficient cause for his non-appearance. The Impugned Award and the Impugned Order are set aside. However, in the facts of the case the following directions are passed:
(ii) The Petitioner is permitted one date to present its evidence.
(iii) The Petitioner shall file its Written Statement before the learned Labour Court within three weeks.”
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J MAY 9, 2025/ ha Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:15:10
M/S HERBUL HENNA EXPORT HOUSE
SH. VINAY KUMAR SINGH
TARA VITASTA GANJU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
