Petition dismissed for nonprosecution. The petitioner failed to appear at the first and second calls of the High Court during the hearing.
Petition dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
INDERJEET MANCHANDA .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
THE DRAT THROUGH REGISTRAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate along with Mr. Arijit Sharma, Advocate for DRAT Bar Association.
Ms. Abha Malhotra, Senior Counsel for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 13.05.2025
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
MAY 13, 2025/neha
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 20:34:10
Inderjeet Manchanda
The DRAT
Subramonium Prasad
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
