Madhu v. Union of India & Ors.

$~15
* IN THE HIG COURT OF DELHI AT NEWDLHI
Date ofdcisn:25 th July, 205
+ W.P(C) 809/217
MADHU .Petionr
roug: h T vBdwj, a in. Ab h M r Advocate.
s ver
UNIO FDA&RS .Respondt
roug: h T Ms. Prtim N. L a a kr, GS, Ms. C
ilendr Kumar Mishra, Mr. Sh a
an d PrCh jpti, Mr. Jitendra a
sh(BSFo far M i Kum
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICAPD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARBHN
JUDGMENT ( ORAL )
1. mn et ak tiner s ,h it peo w n sp rt h e waof y B
ng fte h qu o l a rvc, sei n impugned de o r 426 1.0 ate d ed pa s
by the Inspector Gnral F e ontie Head Qua r te, Bo r de Security r Force
( hereinafter referred to as — BSF “ ) , Punjab, whrby e the ode r ate d
315 20. eputyo f DlSbI nsr c a dTg i G e ntrC ,
k C mphad ,Kg isnrte ow , and the peti
fmw sntaio re p rjctd. e
2. inSu c c tly put, the ponr is a p eti t rrma ne sidnt of Vi e age l
ylpur, P a D . - Mursan, Drcs ti - thrs a H , U.P . A fter completing the
fomal, ist qu re onr ie t hp dCbl(Wm) nte i as po w
W.P(C) 809/217 Page 1 of 7

in BSF vide ame o nt oi p de r ate 1 d 204 F9 .1 wing her ol
me, nt oia p she was sent to STC, Khrkn, Punjab for basic a ecuit r
g. in tra
3. During the course of trag, the p in onr got sick and was eti
mi t e in STC BSF Hospital for medical a d amn on t r e .120 5 ,
w aft, h er she alied p , and was granted , four days arnd l e av by the e
mp et n auhriyc o wih eft crom 4 to 0.12 8 04 1.2 . A s uch,
e t honr i p re wasquidt o re n i jvc aft ser xpiy of the said four
days. How e vr, h e t onrfald to do so. In view of i p e t the petitione
stay fhl ero v av, e the STC, Khrkn a sent thr u nicom s ate d
4, .10 52 6and 12.0 to h er at n i ph en prm
tre sad Viage l - ylpur, P .a D - it an, D rs Mu - thrs a H as givnbyhr e
a t he imofr mncui tre , ingh ka s erto pbc duy aso n
ei h p t wv or ,ly.Hg d eai spr nt cum o d e a th e wb lsi po
g. ca y o mlf neithr psd
4. The etionr b g a psfmyd h ys, a D scplnary i
E nquiry C pndr su wai te o m Section 62 of the BoyA t uiS c d e r
1968 1 . Aordingly, a c Shw C osea u ti cN d1 5w .02 6 s ueo
e t hr,askg o ni p he r tn fh so ea r er gd pyi n ovst a snth re
fncd e , ifany, w i thn a peridf o y hir t dasof rcipt e th e of. spit e D
having ci e r ved the same , the ponr eti gin a failed to respond ro et h .
R esult antly , the ponr eti , vide ode r ate d 315 20. of the Deputy
o r t I ns plSub e c aid yTgC,wG isme d f r ovc
and her ntir period e of absnc from e 04 to 12. 315 was 20.
1 H eraf int ds — the BSF Act “
W.P(C) 809/217 Page 2 of 7