Dismissed

Nasrudin v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC20 Nov 2025W.P.(C)/7551/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition seeking directions against unauthorized construction, the Court noted that the ASI could not locate the challenged property No. 6234 but found sanctioned construction at No. 6230. As no illegal activity was established, the petition was disposed of without orders.

What did the court decide?

No orders were passed as the alleged unauthorized construction was found to be pursuant to a sanctioned building plan.

Nasrudin Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~25

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 7551/2025 & CM APPL. 33656/2025

¶4

NASRUDIN .....Petitioner Through: None.

¶5

versus

¶6

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant N Goyal, Mr. Piyush Wadhwa, Mr. Harsh Kumar Singh, Mr. Kunal Dixit and Mr. R. Singh, Advs. for R-2 to 4. Mob: 9953228888 Email: [email protected] Mr. Mohd. Furqan, Adv. for R-6 & 7 (Through VC) Mr. Piyush Wadhwa, Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr. Harsh Kumar Singh and Mr. Kunal Dixit, Advs. for R-2 to 4 (Through VC).

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶9

O R D E R % 20.11.2025

¶10

None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out.

¶11

The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent nos. 1 to 5, to take action against the illegal and unauthorized construction raised by respondent nos. 6 and 7 at the properties bearing Nos. 6234 and 6234-A, measuring approximately 240 square yards , situated at Kucha Shiv Mandir, Gali Batashan, Near Fatehpuri Masjid, Delhi-110006 (MCD Ward No. 79).

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:48:47

¶13

On the hearing conducted on 28^th May, 2025, this Court had noted the statement made by learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4, i.e., Archaeological Survey of India (“ASI”), that the officials of the ASI had duly visited and inspected the properties question, after receipt of the present petition. However, property No. 6234, as mentioned in the present writ petition, could not be located.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4 reiterates the said position and submits that the said property cannot be located.

¶15

This Court further notes the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the ASI that the officials of the ASI found on-going construction in the property bearing No. 6230 . However, construction in the said property was found to be carried out pursuant to a Sanctioned Building Plan.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 6 and 7 submits that the property of the respondent nos. 6 and 7 is the property bearing No. 6230 . He submits that the construction is being carried out as per Sanctioned Building Plan.

¶17

Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions, no orders are required to be passed by this Court.

¶18

The present writ petition, along with the pending application, is accordingly disposed of.

¶19

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶20

NOVEMBER 20, 2025/ SK

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:48:47

Nasrudin v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nasrudin v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India & Ors. Vs Ic 34187K Col Rajnee Kant Verma

Manjeet Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sushil Kumar Gupta Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Dr Ankit Dhankar and Ors. Vs the Medical Counselling Committee and Ors.

Pratap Infotech Network Private Limited through Its Director Sanjay Goel Vs Income Tax Officer, WARD-20(1), Delhi & Ors.

Inder Dev Gupta Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2

Delhi Laghu Udhyog Manch Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs 290808 Ex Mwo Gobinda Chandra Adhikary

Moinuddin Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Naresh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

R Madhav Bera and Anr. & Anr. Vs Delhi Jal Board

Mehul Goel Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Madhu Jain Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Surya Associates Pvt. Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi