A serving officer's writ petition was withdrawn by counsel, who opted to pursue the contentions before the Armed Forces Tribunal; the High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn with liberty reserved.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to pursue the contentions before the Armed Forces Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
LT COL R SANJAY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nipun Arora, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali, SPC with Mr. Hussain Adil Taqvi, GP and Ms. Usha Jamnal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL) % 04.07.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Mr. Nipun Arora, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this petition and submits that he would take up the contentions raised in this petition before the learned Armed Forces Tribunal.
2. Reserving liberty to do so, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J.
JULY 4, 2025/ AR
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Da te:0 7.07.2025 19:25:48
LT COL R SANJAY
UNION OF INDIA
C. HARI SHANKAR
AJAY DIGPAUL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
