Writ petition withdrawn by counsel on the ground that it contained errors; the Delhi High Court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
Through: Mr. Kamlesh Mishra, Ms. Pragya Jaiswal, Mr. Harshit Bahal & Ms. Renu, Ms. Shivani Verma, Advs. (M: 9279840197)
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Beenashaw Soni (SC, MCD) with Ms. Mansi Jain, Adv. for R-1 & 2. (M: 9810046611) Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, SPC for R-3. (M: 9717736267)
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R
% 21.05.2025
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
MAY 21, 2025/ dk/ck
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 20:05:42
Rahul Singh
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Prathiba M. Singh
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
