Disposed

Hari Prakash Saini and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi HC9 May 2025W.P.(C)/6251/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Legal heirs sought possession of allotted land from the Assistant Settlement Commissioner via writ petition. The court held heirship claims require conclusive establishment in civil proceedings but disposed of the petition directing the respondent to pass an order on the heirs' representation within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No. 2 directed to examine documents annexed to representation dated 18.12.2024 and pass an order within eight weeks; petitioners free to take civil remedies thereafter.

Hari Prakash Saini and Ors. Vs Union of India and… — Succession and Inheritance | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~88

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 6251/2025

¶4

HARI PRAKASH SAINI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. N. Prabhakar, Mr. Uday Sharma, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Sunil, Advocate for UoI. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-2 and 3.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R % 09.05.2025

¶9

CM APPL. 28540/2025 ( for exemption )

¶10

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

The application stands disposed of.

¶12

W.P.(C) 6251/2025

¶13

The petitioners, claiming to be 40 out of 51 legal heirs of the late Shri Ganga Sahai, have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, for a direction upon the respondent No. 2—Assistant Settlement Commissioner, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, to hand over possession of 31.5 Bighas of land in the village Badarpur Majra, Burari, Delhi, [“subject land”]. According to the

¶14

W.P.(C) 6251/2025

¶15

Page 1 of 3

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:17:14

¶18

petitioners, this land is their share out of land originally allotted to late Shri Ganga Sahai.

¶19

The matter has travelled to this Court on earlier occasions with regard to eviction of unauthorised occupants from the lands claimed by the petitioners. The issue, at this stage, however, is that the respondent authorities have allegedly not handed over possession of the lands to the petitioners. The respondents, by a decision dated 21.03.2023, referred to alternative claims over some part of the share in the subject land, and noted that the share of each of the legal heirs of late Shri Ganga Sahai has not been decided. The Assistant Settlement Commissioner required probate or Letters of Administration to be submitted, as claims of some of the petitioners were partially dependent upon testamentary bequests.

¶20

It is contended on behalf of the petitioners, that such a requirement of probate or Letter of Administration is contrary to the legal position prevailing in Delhi. Further, it is submitted that after the said order, the petitioners have made a detailed representation, alongwith documentary support, to the respondents on 18.12.2024, asserting their claims and placing the chain of documents, which establish their status as heirs of late Shir Ganga Sahai.

¶21

I am of the view that the question of the petitioners’ claims to the subject land in question would require to be established conclusively in civil proceedings, rather than by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. Several questions of fact would require determination on evidence, particularly as the petitioners are evidently claiming through a chain of inheritance going back three generations.

¶22

Be that as it may, at this stage, Mr. N. Prabhakar, learned counsel

¶23

W.P.(C) 6251/2025

¶24

Page 2 of 3

¶25

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:17:14

¶26

for the petitioners, seeks a limited direction that the respondents dispose of their representation dated 18.12.2024 by way of a speaking order. In the event the petitioners are nonetheless required to prove their title , he submits that they will take appropriate civil remedies at that stage.

¶27

Having regard to this submission, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon the respondent No. 2 to examine the documents annexed to the petitioners’ representation dated 18.12.2024 (which have not been placed on record in this writ petition, but apparently have been submitted to the respondent) and pass an order within eight weeks from today.

¶28

The petitioners will be free to take appropriate civil remedies, if necessary, thereafter.

¶29

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶30

MAY 9, 2025 ‘Bhupi/JM’/

¶31

W.P.(C) 6251/2025

¶32

Page 3 of 3

¶33

This is a digitally signed order.

¶34

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:17:14

Hari Prakash Saini and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hari Prakash Saini and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Nikon Finlease Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -04, Delhi & Ors.

Sqn Ldr Swati Prakash Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Vinod Sharma Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Ajay Prakash Mishra Vs the Registrar Cooperative Societies through Assistant Registrar & Anr.

Maanoj Agarwala Vs Idbi Bank

Loconav India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assessment Unit Income Tax Department Delhi and Anr.

Sandeep Chopra Vs Commissioner of MCD & Ors.

Rajkumar Sukhdevsinhji & Anr. Vs Idbi Bank

Narender Kumar Gupta Vs Indian Council of Social Science Research & Anr.

M/S Sri Satyasainath Real Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi Another

Abdul Faheem Khan Vs Jamia Millia Islamia, University

Jyoti Saklani & Ors. Vs Technology Information Forecasting and Assessment Council through Its Chairman & Ors.

Uttam Singh and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dr Sanjay Kant Prasad Vs the Director, Academic Coordination Division, Indira Gandhi National Open University & Ors.