Bhagat Ram v. Kishan Chand
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenges High Court dismissal of condonation of delay application. High Court accepts brotherly relationship and mediation reference allows written statement on record with cost.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order set aside; Written statement taken on record upon payment of ₹30,000/-.
What the court decided
$~6
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- C.R.P. 59/2024
BHAGAT RAM .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shubhankar Sharma, Adv.
versus
KISHAN CHAND .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikram Gujral, Ms. Akanksha Singh & Mr. Aryan Kalia, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 03.02.2025
- The present petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 28.11.2023 passed by the learned ACJ-ARC, Saket Courts, Delhi, in CS SCJ 445/2022, pursuant to which the application under Order VIII Rule 1 read with Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed by the petitioner / defendant seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement was dismissed and the defence of the petitioner was struck off.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its writ jurisdiction to set aside an order dismissing a condonation of delay application in a property suit between brothers.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BHAGAT RAM
- respondent
KISHAN CHAND
Coram
AMIT MAHAJAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court