A writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor its counsel appeared despite service by speed post, e-mail and WhatsApp.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
M/S. R.S. DRESS DESIGN PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: None.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ranvir Singh, SPC for R1/UOI. Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Mr. Jai Ahuja & Mr. Akshay Saxena, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
The record would reflect that although the writ petitioner has been duly served by speed post, e-mail as well as WhatsApp, none has appeared on its behalf when the matter was called.
Consequently, the writ petition shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
MARCH 3, 2025/v
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:34:52
M/S. R.S. Dress Design Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
Yashwant Varma
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
