Allowed

M/S Ge Power Gmbh ( Earlier Known as M/S Ge Power Ag and Ealier to That as Alstom Power Ag) v. Assistent Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Int Tax 1(3) (1) and Anr.

Delhi HC21 May 2025W.P.(C)/5815/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Non-resident GE group companies challenged Section 148 reassessment notices for AYs 2013-14 to 2017-18 based on a survey suggesting a dependent and fixed place permanent establishment in India. The court found no tangible material supporting the PE belief, followed earlier Delhi High Court decisions covering identical issues, allowed the petitions, and set aside the impugned notices.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S Ge Power Gmbh ( Earlier Known as M/S Ge Power Ag and Ealier to… — Income Tax | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~63 to 78

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision : 21.05.2025

¶4

+ W.P.(C) 4207/2022

¶5

- W.P.(C) 4759/2022

¶6

- W.P.(C) 4760/2022

¶7

- W.P.(C) 4761/2022

¶8

- W.P.(C) 4762/2022

¶9

- W.P.(C) 4763/2022

¶10

- W.P.(C) 5172/2022

¶11

- W.P.(C) 5174/2022

¶12

- W.P.(C) 5337/2022

¶13

- W.P.(C) 5338/2022

¶14

- W.P.(C) 5799/2022

¶15

- W.P.(C) 5815/2022

¶16

- W.P.(C) 5816/2022

¶17

- W.P.(C) 7572/2022

¶18

- W.P.(C) 7573/2022 + W.P.(C) 9194/2022 & CM APPL. 29313/2022

¶19

M/S GE STEAM POWER SYSTEMS (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S. ALSTOM POWER SYSTEM SA) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Ankul Goyal, Mr. Priyam Bhatnagar, Advocates.

¶20

versus

¶21

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INT TAX 1 (1) (1) AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC. Mr. Sunil Agarwal, SSC with Mr. Shivansh B. Pandya, JSC; Mr. Viplav Acharya, JSC; Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSC

¶22

Signature Not Verified

¶23

Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶24

Page 1 of 10

¶25

and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocate. Mr Puneet Rai, SSC, Mr Ashvini Kumar and Mr Rishabh Nangia, JSCs and Mr Nikhil Jain, Advocate.

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

¶27

VIBHU BAKHRU, J. ( ORAL )

¶28

The petitioners have filed the present petitions impugning notices issued by the Assessing Officer [ AO ] under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [ Act ] seeking to assess / reassess the income of the Petitioner/s for Assessment Years [ AY ] ranging from 2013-14 to 2017-18. The tabular statement setting out the notices impugned in each of the aforesaid petitions, is set out below:

¶29

S.NO	PETITIONER	WRIT PETITION	ASSESSMENT YEAR	DATE OF NOTICE
		NO.
1.	GE Steam Power	4759/2022	2013-14	19.03.2021
	Inc.	4762/2022	2014-15	30.03.2021
		4763/2022	2015-16	30.03.2021
		4761/2022	2016-17	19.03.2021
		4760/2022	2017-18	19.03.2021
2.	GE Steam Power	4207/2022	2015-16	31.03.2021
	System	5172/2022	2013-14	30.03.2021

¶30

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶31

Page 2 of 10

¶32

		5174/2022	2014-15	30.03.2021
		5337/2022	2016-17	24.03.2021
		5338/2022	2017-18	19.03.2021
3.	GE (Shanghai) Power Technology Co. Ltd.	5799/2022	2013-14	17.03.2021
4.	GE Power	5815/2022	2016-17	30.03.2021
	GMBH GE Power GMBH	5816/2022	2017-18	30.03.2021
5.	GE Power Solutions Malaysia	7572/2022	2015-16	30.03.2021
6.	General Electric (Switzerland) GMBH	7573/2022	2017-18	30.03.2021
7.	GE Power SP.Z.O. O	9194/2022	2017-18	19.03.2021

¶33

The material facts obtaining in the present petitions and the issues involved are identical, therefore the petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

¶34

The short facts with respect to each of the Petitioners are summarized

¶35

Signature Not Verified

¶36

Digitally Signed By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶37

W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters

¶38

Page 3 of 10

¶39

below:

¶40

i. GE Steam Power Inc. (formerly known as Alstom Power Inc.) is a company incorporated in the United States of America and is engaged in the business of manufacturing, sales, marketing of power generation equipment and technical support services and is part of GE’s ‘Power’ business vertical. GE Steam Power Inc. was formally known as Alstom Power Inc. and was a part of the Alstom Group till 02.11.2015. However, the Alstom Power business was acquired by GE in 2015 and since then, the Petitioner is a part of the GE Group.

¶41

ii. The Petitioners are not tax residents of India. Each of the petitioners had received certain incomes in the nature of Fee for Technical Services [ FTS ] for previous years relevant to AY 2013-14 to 2017-18, which were taxable in India and accordingly, they had filed their respective returns of income for the relevant assessment years.

¶42

iii. GE Steam Power Systems [ GSPS ] is a company incorporated under the laws of France and is engaged in the business of supplying power plant equipment and its components and systems used to control and recover energy. It is part of GE’s ‘Power’ business vertical. GSPS was formally known as Alstom Power Systems SA and was a part of the Alstom

¶43

Signature Not Verified

¶44

Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶45

Page 4 of 10

¶46

Group till 02.11.2015. However, the Alstom Power business was acquired by GE in 2015 and since then, GSPS is a part of the GE Group. GSPS is not a tax resident of India. According to the Petitioner, it had received certain incomes in the nature of FTS for previous years relevant to AY 2013-14 to 2017-18, which were taxable in India and accordingly, returns of income were filed for the said AYs.

¶47

iv. GE (Shanghai) Power Technology Co. Ltd. [ GSPTCL ] is a company incorporated under the laws of China and is engaged in the business of supplying power generation equipment and spares and is part of GE’s ‘Power’ business vertical. GSPTCL was formally known as Alstom Technical Services (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. and was a part of the Alstom Group till 02.11.2015. However, the Alstom Power business was acquired by GE in 2015 and since then, GSPTCL is a part of the GE Group. GSPTCL is also not a tax resident of India. According to the GSPTCL, it has not received any income, which was chargeable to tax in India in the previous year relevant to AY 2013-14 and accordingly, did not file its return of income for the said AY.

¶48

v. GE Power GmbH [ GPG ] is a company incorporated under the laws of Germany and is engaged in the business of power plants, turbine, generators etc. and is part of GE’s ‘Power’

¶49

Signature Not Verified

¶50

Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶51

Page 5 of 10

¶52

business vertical. GPG was formally known as Alstom Power AG and was a part of the Alstom Group till 02.11.2015. However, the Alstom Power business was acquired by GE in 2015 and since then, GPG is a part of the GE Group. GPG is not a tax resident of India. According to the GPG, it has received certain income in the nature of FTS for previous years relevant to AY 2016-17 and 2017-18, which were taxable in India. Accordingly, it had filed its returns of income for the said relevant assessment years.

¶53

vi.

¶54

GE Power Solutions (Malaysia) SDN. BHD [ GPSSB ] is a company incorporated under the laws of Malaysia and is engaged in the business of construction and project management of power plants and supplying of power generation engineering spares and related services and is part of GE’s ‘Power’ business vertical. GPSSB was formerly known as Alstom Asia Pacific SDN. BHD. and was a part of the Alstom Group till 02.11.2015. However, the Alstom Power business was acquired by GE in 2015 and since then, the Petitioner is a part of the GE Group. GPSSB is not a tax resident of India. According to GPSSB, it has not received any income, which was chargeable to tax in India in the previous year relevant to AY 2015-16 and therefore had not filed its return of income for the said assessment year.

¶55

Signature Not Verified

¶56

Digitally Signed By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶57

Page 6 of 10

¶58

W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters

¶59

vii. General Electric (Switzerland) GmbH [ GESB ] is a company incorporated under the laws of Switzerland and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and supply of generators and auxiliary systems for hydroelectric power projects is part of GE’s ‘Power’ business vertical. GESG was formally known as Alstom Switzerland Limited and was a part of the Alstom Group till 02.11.2015. However, the Alstom Power business was acquired by GE in 2015 and since then, the Petitioner is a part of the GE Group. GESG is not a tax resident of India. According to GESG, it was engaged in offshore supply of equipment to third party previous years relevant to AY 201718, which were taxable in India. Accordingly, it had filed its return of income for AY 2017-18.

¶60

viii.

¶61

GE Power SP.Z.O.O. [ GPS ] is a company incorporated under the laws of Poland and is engaged in the business of Engine, Turbine and Power Transmission Equipment. GPS was formally known as Alstom Power SP.Z.O.O. and was a part of the Alstom Group till 02.11.2015. However, the Alstom Power business was acquired by GE in 2015 and since then, GPS is a part of the GE Group. GPS is not a tax resident of India. According to the Petitioner, it has not received any income, which was chargeable to tax in India in the previous year relevant to AY 2017-18 and therefore did not file its return of income for the said assessment year.

¶62

Signature Not Verified

¶63

Digitally Signed By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶64

W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters

¶65

Page 7 of 10

¶66

It is stated that in compliance of the notices issued under Section 148 of the Act, the Petitioners furnished their return of income for the relevant assessment years. The Petitioners also sought the reasons recorded for reopening of the assessments, which were provided to them. The reasons to believe that the income of the respective petitioner had escaped assessment for the relevant assessment year, recorded by the AO are similar in some of the material aspects. The AO’s reasons to believe that the Petitioner’s income has escaped assessment is primarily based on a survey that was conducted under Section 133A(1) of the Act. The said survey was conducted on 06-07/06/2019 in the premises of GE Power India Ltd. which is a company incorporated in India and engaged in ‘Power’ business vertical of the GE Group, and GE T&D India Ltd., which is also a company incorporated in India and engaged in ‘Transmission and Distribution’ business vertical of the GE group.

¶67

The AO recorded that it was found during the survey proceedings that the companies of the erstwhile Alstom Group which was engaged in ‘Power’ business have a Permanent Establishment [ PE ] in India in the form of a Dependent Agent PE and Fixed Place PE. Thus, part of their business income attributable to their PEs is chargeable to tax in India.

¶68

The AO also noted that post survey operations, it was found that the Petitioner had made certain supplies to Indian entities. However, no tax was deducted on the payments made by the Indian entity for the said supplies. Thus, the same were not declared in India. The AO referred to the statements of various employees of GE Power India Ltd. and GE T&D India

¶69

Signature Not Verified

¶70

Digitally Signed By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶71

W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters

¶72

Page 8 of 10

¶73

Ltd. recorded during the survey conducted on 06-07/06/2019 and observed that the Petitioner had a Dependent PE and a Fixed Place PE in India. And, on the aforesaid basis alleged that the Petitioner’s business income attributable to its PE was chargeable to tax under the Act.

¶74

The Petitioner objected to the initiation of the assessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Act primarily on the ground that there was no tangible material for the AO to conclude that the Petitioner had a PE in India during the previous year relevant to the assessment years in respect of which the impugned notices have been issued. However, the objections raised by the Petitioner were rejected.

¶75

A plain reading of the reasons as recorded clearly indicates that there was no tangible material for forming a belief that the Petitioners had a dependent PE or a Fixed Place PE in India during the previous years relevant to the said assessment years in respect of which the impugned notices under Section 148 of the Act are issued, was sustainable.

¶76

Concededly, the question involved in the present petitions is covered in favour of the Petitioners by earlier decisions of this court in Grid Solutions OY (Ltd.) v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Neutral Citation No.: 2025:DHC:214-DB , order dated 07.02.2025 in WP(C) No.5095/2022 captioned UK Grid Solutions Ltd. v. ACIT , order dated 12.02.2025 in WP(C) No.1629/2022 captioned GE Hydro France v. ACIT, GE Grid (Switzerland) GmbH v. ACIT: Neutral Citation No.: 2025:DHC:1280-DB and GE Renewables Grid LLC (formerly known as

¶77

Signature Not Verified

¶78

Digitally Signed By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶79

W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters

¶80

Page 9 of 10

¶81

Alstom Grid Inc. / Alstom Grid LLC) v. ACIT, 2025:DHC:2911 – DB.

¶82

In view of the above, the present petitions are allowed and the impugned notices are set aside.

¶83

The petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

TEJAS KARIA, J

MAY 21, 2025 RK

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶88

Signature Not Verified

¶89

Digitally Signed By:TARUN RANA Signing Da te:2 7.05.2025 18:08:07

¶90

W.P.(C) 4207/2022 & connected matters

¶91

Page 10 of 10

M/S Ge Power Gmbh ( Earlier Known as M/S Ge Power Ag and Ealier to That as Alstom Power Ag) v. Assistent Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Int Tax 1(3) (1) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S Ge Power Gmbh ( Earlier Known as M/S Ge Power Ag and Ealier to That as Alstom Power Ag) v. Assistent Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Int Tax 1(3) (1) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Frisco Global Private Limited Vs Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement and Anr.

M/S Ambiience Metcorp Private Limited through Its Director Sh Sandeep Agarwal Vs Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs through Its Chairman & Anr.

Ashok Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Y.P.Spices P Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Trade Taxes & Anr.

Lokesh Sachdeva Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Centre Circle 28 Delhi & Ors.

Chirag Garg Vs Commissioner State Tax, Delhi GST

Santosh Kumar Pandey Vs Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India & Ors.

Jaya Saigal Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi through Chief Secretary & Ors.

Sumit Somani Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- 12 & Ors.

Aon Consulting Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 1(1), Delhi & Ors.

Flex International Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Ge Steam Power Inc( Earlier Known as M/S Alstom Power Inc) Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

M/S Ge Steam Power Systems (Earlier Known as M/S. Alstom Power System Sa) Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle Int Tax 1 (1)(1) and Anr.

Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Faceless Penalty Centre & Anr.