Writ petition concerning an SSC recruitment exercise was withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, which has jurisdiction over such grievances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
versus
STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, Mr. Sanjay Pal, Advocates for UoI.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 16.05.2025
After some hearing, Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal [“Tribunal”], as the petitioner’s grievance pertains to a recruitment exercise being undertaken by the Staff Selection Commission, over which the Tribunal exercises jurisdiction.
The writ petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MAY 16, 2025 ‘Bhupi/SD’/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:01:45
Anjali
Staff Selection Commission
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
