(order dated 07.09.2017 in W.P.C 2566/2017) by filing an SLP in the Supreme Court being Special Leave Petition (Diary) no.28875/2018. By an order dated 24.08.2018 passed in the said SLP, the Supreme Court had granted relief and directed that status quo be maintained and had tagged the SLP alongwith SLP (Civil) No.19192/2018, which this court is informed was preferred by Manushi Sangathan. However, thereafter, the SLP preferred by the petitioners was dismissed by an order dated 06.01.2022. The Supreme Court expressly vacated the ad interim relief granted earlier. 4. In view of the above, we find merit in the contentions advanced on behalf of the MCD that the relief sought by the petitioner is not required to be re-visited. 5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioners are similarly placed as members of Manushi Sangathan. He submits that certain protective orders have been passed to permit members of Manushi Sangathan to vend in the given area at Nehru Place notwithstanding that it has been declared as a no vending/no hawking zone and the petitioners must be extended a similar relief.
