A writ petition by a student's father against a school was withdrawn after counsel stated the grievance had been redressed; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
NAINA RAWAT THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL FATHER MR. NARESH SINGH RAWAT.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Mr. Kumar Utkarsh and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates.
versus
K. R. MANGALAM WORLD SCHOOL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Batra, Advocate for R2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 21.03.2025
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
MARCH 21, 2025/ jg
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2025 at 11:40:09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance against the respondent school had been redressed, permitting withdrawal of the writ petition.
Naina Rawat through her next friend and natural father Mr. Naresh Singh Rawat
K. R. Mangalam World School
Anr.
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
