Dismissed¶11

Naresh Kumar Anand v. M/S Gold Square Sales Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC17 Nov 2025C.R.P./319/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Naresh Kumar Anand v. M/s Gold Square Sales Pvt Ltd, C.R.P. 319/2025 & CM APPLs. 71694-71695/2025, High Court of Delhi, Prateek Jalan, J., decided 17.11.2025. Civil revision dismissed as withdrawn; challenge to trial court order dated 25.08.2025 rejecting application under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for return of plaint in CS DJ 239/2018 for lack of territorial jurisdiction; liberty reserved to petitioner to seek framing of additional issue on jurisdiction before Trial Court (Saket Court); no merits observations; no costs/quantum; no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner, without prejudice, to pursue his rights and contentions before the Trial Court, including the right to seek framing of an additional issue on the question of jurisdiction. ¶11

Naresh Kumar Anand Vs M/S Gold Square Sales Pvt. Ltd. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Liberty to the petitioner, without prejudice, to pursue his rights and contentions before the Trial Court, including the right to seek framing of an additional issue on the question of jurisdiction.

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the plaint in CS DJ 239/2018 ought to be returned to the respondent-plaintiff on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction (the subject of the Order VII Rule 10 CPC application whose dismissal was under challenge). Not decided, as the revision petition was withdrawn.

¶10

Court's answer

The Court made no observation on the merits of any remedy that may be sought by the petitioner before the Trial Court; the territorial jurisdiction question was expressly left open.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

The revision petition, along with pending applications, was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his rights and contentions before the Trial Court, including the right to seek framing of an additional issue on the question of jurisdiction.

¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Prateek Jalan, J.), order dated 17.11.2025 in C.R.P. 319/2025: The defendant in CS DJ 239/2018 (Court of the learned District Judge-03, South District, Saket Court) had challenged the trial court's order dated 25.08.2025 dismissing his application under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by which he sought return of the plaint to the plaintiff (M/s Gold Square Sales Pvt Ltd) for want of territorial jurisdiction. After some hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the revision petition without prejudice to the petitioner's rights and contentions before the Trial Court, including the right to seek framing of an additional issue on the question of jurisdiction. Held: the revision petition, along with pending applications, was dismissed as withdrawn with the said liberty, and the Court made clear that it had made no observation on the merits of any remedy that may be sought before the Trial Court.

¶1

$~44

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

C.R.P. 319/2025 & CM APPLs. 71694-71695/2025 NARESH KUMAR ANAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Chitravanshi, Mr. Mukund Gupta & Ms. Poonam Dolo, Advocates.

¶4

versus

¶5

M/S GOLD SQUARE SALES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: None.

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

% 17.11.2025

¶9

The petitioner, who is the defendant in CS DJ 239/2018 pending before the Court of the learned District Judge-03, South District, Saket Court, has challenged an order dated 25.08.2025, by which his application under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was dismissed.

¶10

The petitioner has sought return of the plaint to the respondent– plaintiff on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.

¶11

After some hearing, Mr. Abhay Chitravanshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this revision petition, without prejudice to the petitioner’s rights and contentions before the Trial Court, including the right to seek framing of an additional issue on the question of jurisdiction.

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

C.R.P. 319/2025

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2025 at 14:18:43

¶16

The revision petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.

¶17

It is made clear that this Court has made no observation on the merits of any remedy that may be sought by the petitioner before the Trial Court.

¶18

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶19

NOVEMBER 17, 2025

‘pv/KA’/

Page 2 of 2

C.R.P. 319/2025

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2025 at 14:18:43

Naresh Kumar Anand v. M/S Gold Square Sales Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar Anand v. M/S Gold Square Sales Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Master Mukul (Thr Father Pradeep Kumar) Vs Surender Kumar & Ors. (United India Insurance Co. Ltd)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Mohd Saleem (Since Deceased) through His Legal Representatives & Ors.

Lado @ Lada Devi & Anr. Vs United India Insurance Companmy Limited & Anr.

Ravi Gupta Vs Sanjay Chaturvedi

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Mohd Imran & Ors.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Bindu Devi and Ors.