Applications for modification of an order dated 12 March 2025 in writ petitions against MCD; counsel sought withdrawal and the applications were dismissed as withdrawn. An exemption application was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48 & 49
Through: Mr. Kshitiz Mahipal with Ms. Khairun Nisa, Advocates. (M): 9999994372 Email: [email protected]
versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC, MCD with Mr. Shivam, Advocate for MCD. (M): 9911991166 Email: [email protected]
49
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC, MCD with Mr. Shivam, Advocate for MCD. (M): 9911991166 Email: [email protected]
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 21:01:08
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 27.03.2025
CM APPL. 18028/2025 (For Exemption)
CM APPLs. 18027/2025 & 18026/2025 (Applications for modification of order dated 1 2 th March, 2025)
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
MARCH 27, 2025
c
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 21:01:08
Savita Taneja
Vaibhav Taneja
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
