Hearing adjourned; petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal; matter disposed of upon withdrawal.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted pending applications dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach CAT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Gokul Sharma, GP & Mr. Rahul Mourya, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 11.03.2025
CM APPL. 14499/2025 ( Exemption )
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 3069/2025 & CM APPL. 14498/2025
After some hearing, Mr. Ankur Chhibber, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
The writ petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MARCH 11, 2025 ‘pv’/SD/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2025 at 11:22:25
Harish Kumar
Union of India
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
