In this revision petition, the High Court of Delhi held that a revision under Section 115 of the CPC is not maintainable against a decree. The court dismissed the petition as not maintainable and left it open for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedies.
Revision petition dismissed as not maintainable; liberty granted to avail appropriate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
RAM SHANKAR DAS AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anuraag Mehta and Mr. Ganga Sagar Singh, Advocates.
versus
SUSHIL VERMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tanishq Sirohi and Mr. Suryansh Vashisth, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 12.11.2025
C.R.P. 293/2025 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2025 at 11:45:19
PRATEEK JALAN, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2025 SS/SD/
C.R.P. 293/2025 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2025 at 11:45:19
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision petition is maintainable against a decree passed in civil proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Shankar Das and Ors
Sushil Verma
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
