Petitioners sought withdrawal of a writ petition challenging an order of the Financial Commissioner, with liberty to pursue civil proceedings including an injunction application. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without the Court expressing any view on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
RAM KISHAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Kapoor, Advocate.
versus
INDER SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 04.03.2025
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to institute appropriate civil proceedings, in terms of the liberty granted by the impugned order dated 06.12.2024 passed by the learned Financial Commissioner.
It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the dispute, and it is open to the petitioner to file an appropriate application for injunction before the Civil Court.
The writ petition, along with pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MARCH 4, 2025 SS/SD/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:30:05
RAM KISHAN & ORS.
INDER SINGH
ANR. (second respondent)
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
