Avit Education v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
單筆申請請求指導師培訓課程獲得認可。法院認為該爭議已由W.P.(C) 2813/2021序及W.P.(C) 16610/2023命令處理。因此,法院隨順先前判決且無進一步指示,駁回該申請。
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~69
AVIT EDUCATION .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant and Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Advocates
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Akhilesh K. Srivastva, Standing Counsel, NCTE with Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey and Mr. Robin Kumar, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA O R D E R % 03.03.2025
“a. issue an appropriate writ(s) or order(s) or direction(s) directing the respondents to provide an online link for submission of application by the petitioner institution seeking grant of recognition for running the teacher training course namely D.El.Ed. (Additional Intake) from the ensuing academic session in terms of Regulations,2014; and / or
b. pass any other order or orders which may deem fit and proper on the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:37:23
in terms of the order passed in W.P.(C) 16610/2023 dated 21.12.2023. The order dated 21.12.2023 in W.P.(C) 16610/2023 reads as under:-
“1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Issue notice.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents accepts notice.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties jointly submit that the controversy involved in the instant case stands covered by order dated 15.09.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 12125/2023 and other connected matters.
5. The order dated 15.09.2023 reads as under:-
2. The Hon’ble Division Bench vide order dated 18.11.2022 in LPA 507/2022, granted liberty to NCTE to file a review petition before the Hon’ble Single Judge, who passed the order on 24.08.2022 in W.P.(C) 2813/2021.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, however, submit that on 31.01.2023, on an application filed by the petitioner-institution, the order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in LPA 507/2022 on 18.11.2022 has been recalled. According to them, the Hon’ble Division Bench has expressed to decide the matter in LPA itself.
4. Having considered the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, it would be apposite to dispose of the instant petitions in similar terms of W.P.(C) 2813/2021
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:37:23
dated 24.08.2022 and by subsequent order dated 31.08.2022.
5. Needless to state that if the order dated 24.08.2022, passed in W.P.(C) 2813/2021 is modified or set aside in pending LPA 507/2022, the same would govern the further course of action.
6. With aforesaid directions, the instant petitions stand disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any.”
6. In view of the aforesaid, let the directions passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 12125/2023 be made applicable mutatis mutandis in the instant case also.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:37:23
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
MARCH 3, 2025 N/HT
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:37:23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ petition regarding recognition for D.El.Ed. Additional Intake course in terms of the order in W.P.(C) 16610/2023.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) 16610/2023 dated 21.12.2023Relied on¶15
W.P.(C) 12125/2023Relied on¶15
order dated 24.08.2022 in W.P.(C) 2813/2021Relied on¶23
LPA 507/2022Relied on¶23
W.P.(C) 12125/2023 dated 15.09.2023Relied on¶21
W.P.(C) nos. 7537/2024, 8557/2024, 13309/2024, 11217/2024, 13182/2024, 7669/2024, 7815/2024, 7841/2024, 8486/2024, 9111/2024 and 9116/2024Referred¶33
AVIT EDUCATION
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court